Leathers v. Tupelo Coffee Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \ Olson does not necessarily deny standing to one whose status in a residence is less than that of an overnight guest.\
• “Since a reasonable view of the evidence supports a determination that appellant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy sufficient to assert Fourth Amendment protection, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).