Leather v. Eyck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Heck does not bar a § 1983 selective prosecution claim but only because the plaintiff in that case was “never in the custody of the State” and therefore had “no remedy in habeas corpus,” unlike Plaintiff here, who was in the custody of New York

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).