Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corporation and Midtown Ignition and Parts Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “litigation-induced pronouncements of inventor ... have no effect on what the words of that document in fact do convey”
• inventor attempting to explain non-obviousness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).