Lealaimatafao v. Woodward-Clyde Consultants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the list following the term “including” was intended “to be exemplary of the type of claims which may be brought for the loss of love and affection” pursuant to HRS § 663-3
• “By using the term ‘including,’ the legislature intended the enumerated claims to be exemplary of the type of claims which may be brought ....”
• “[T]he language of HRS § 663-3 is plain and unambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).