Leal v. Smith
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2467
Syllabus
Appellant alleges that errors occurred during the hearing in his divorce proceedings, but he has not filed a transcript of the hearing. Given this, there is nothing for this court to review, and the regularity of the trial court's proceeding must be presumed. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that something more than a “jury’s common knowledge of the generic (and incom- plete
- explaining that “evidence may give rise to multiple reasonable inferences and that choice between those reason- able inferences is a matter for the jury”
- explaining that “a party may rely on reasonable inferences arising from circumstan- tial evidence to establish elements of a criminal offense”
- explaining that “a party may rely on reasonable inferences arising from circumstan- tial evidence to establish elements of a criminal offense”
- providing that “facts in issue can ‘be established by reasonable inferences, but not through speculation’ ”
- explaining that something more than a “jury’s common knowledge of the generic (and incom- plete
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.