Skip to main content
· 7/25/2011

Leake v. PRENSKY

Citations

  • 798 F. Supp. 2d 254
  • 75 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 151
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80307
  • 2011 WL 3020038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that HAMP does not provide a private cause of action and citing numerous cases
  • concluding that bank could enforce note’s foreclosure provision under District of Columbia law, despite its failure to record the assignment of the note
  • concluding that bank could enforce note's foreclosure provision under District of Columbia law, despite its failure to record the assignment of the note
  • “The District of Columbia is a non-judicial foreclosure jurisdiction, which allows foreclosure pursuant to a 22 ‘power of sale provision contained in any deed of trust.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Royce C. Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.