Leake v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that factors such as odor of alcohol, slurred speech, unsteadiness in walking, and poor balance demonstrated intoxication within the definition of Code § 4.1-100
• holding that circumstantial evidence demonstrated that the defendant was intoxicated and that a chemical test of his blood or breath was not required to convict him of driving while intoxicated
• applying the definition of intoxication in Code § 4.1-100 to Code § 18.2-266
• applying the definition of intoxication in Code § 4.1-100 to Code § 18.2-266
• applying the Code § 4.1-100 definition of intoxication to Code § 18.2-266
• applying the Code § 4.1-100 definition of intoxication to Code § 18.2-266

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).