Leake v. Casati

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even evidence that the property would be less valuable if divided [has been] held ‘insufficient to deprive a co-owner of his ‘sacred right’ to property.’” (quoting Sensabaugh v. Sensabaugh, 232 Va. 250, 349 S.E.2d 141, 146 (1986))
• \Even evidence that the property would be less valuable if divided [has been] held `insufficient to deprive a co-owner of his `sacred right' to property.'\ (quoting Sensabaugh v. Sensabaugh, 232 Va. 250, 349 S.E.2d 141, 146 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).