Leak v. Grant Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting existence of “at least two more easily imagined efficient enforcers”: patients and the government
• stating that the plaintiff did not suffer an antitrust injury although he was denied privileges at a particular hospital because he retained staff privileges at two other local hospitals and was therefore still “fully able to compete with other physicians in his field”
• “We begin with the general proposition that the health care profession is not immune from scrutiny under federal antitrust laws.”
• “We begin with the general proposition that the health care profession is not immune from scrutiny under federal antitrust laws.”
• “The Court does not find ... that the above authorities establish a per se rule that a health care professional could never have standing to assert antitrust claims arising from the denial of hospital staff privileges.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).