Leahy v. Conant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that medical malpractice and negligence claims sound in tort and are therefore not subject to this Court’s jurisdiction
• finding that plaintiff did not “point to any provision of the alleged contract” entitling him to relief and had thus not met Rule 9(k)’s standards
• determining that the United States Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate claims of negligence and medical malpractice because they are torts
• stating that negligence is a tort
• “This court is unable to transfer any case to the state court system, as no state court falls within the definition in § 610.”
• “[I]t is axiomatic that the complaint may not be amended by the briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).