Leahmer v. McCullough
Citations
- 99 Kan. 451
- 162 P. 297
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Promissory Note — Indorsement “Without Recourse” — Second Indorser — Oral Evidence. When the plaintiff purchased the note sued on, payable to the order of A. E. Hostetler, the first three lines indorsed theron were:</p> <p>“A. E. Hostetler.</p> <p>“Without recourse</p> <p>“M. E. Long.”</p> <p>Held, that oral evidence was competent to show that the words “Without recourse” were written by and intended to^appply to the payee, A. E. Hostetler.</p>
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.