Skip to main content
· 1/6/1917

Leahmer v. McCullough

Citations

  • 99 Kan. 451
  • 162 P. 297

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Promissory Note — Indorsement “Without Recourse” — Second Indorser — Oral Evidence. When the plaintiff purchased the note sued on, payable to the order of A. E. Hostetler, the first three lines indorsed theron were:</p> <p>“A. E. Hostetler.</p> <p>“Without recourse</p> <p>“M. E. Long.”</p> <p>Held, that oral evidence was competent to show that the words “Without recourse” were written by and intended to^appply to the payee, A. E. Hostetler.</p>

Judges: West

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.