League v. Rogan
Citations
- 59 Tex. 427
- 1883 Tex. LEXIS 189
Syllabus
<p>1. Patent — Void and voidable.— A patent issued by the proper officers of the state upon a valid land certificate, though issued to one claiming under a forged transfer of the certificate, conveys title within the meaning of the statute of limitations of three years. One having a pre-existing right attempted to be conveyed by the forged transfer is not concluded by the issuance of the patent, nor is the state; but as to all other persons the patent is conclusive in favor of the patentee.</p> <p>%■ Same.— Such patent is not void, but voidable only; and the real owner of the certificate, whose transfer thereof was forged, may elect to permit the patent to stand, .and by suit have judgment rendered vesting legal title in himself by reason of his equitable title existing prior to the patent: or he may, by proceedings begun in time,,procure a cancellation of the patent and the issuance of another to himself. This case distinguished from Wright v. Daily, 26 Tex., 730; Harris v. Hardeman, 27 Tex., 249; Eliot v. Whitaker, 30 Tex., 420, and other cases cited.</p> <p>8. Same — Limitation. — Such a patent, io issued upon a forged transfer of a certificate, constitutes such title as will support the plea of limitation of three years. Smith v. Power, 23 Tex., 33, discussed ;.nd distinguished from this case.</p> <p>4. Patent — Title.— A patent issued on n valid certificate by the officers authorized to investigate the patentee’s right to it, and by its issuance to extend title, passes to the patentee the naked legal title. It does not pass the paramount title if the certificate on which it issues belongs to some other person than the patentee; but it does pg,ss, as against the government, title valid in itself.</p> <p>5. Void and voidable.— A title effective against some persons, but not against all persons, is not void but voidable.</p> <p>6. Cases reviewed and discussed. — Varamendi v. Hutchins, 48 Tex., 531, and Burleson v. Burleson, 28 Tex., 417, reviewed and discussed in
Judges: Stayton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Monroe Cattle Co. v. BeckerSupreme Court· 1893-01-03· cited 55×
- Robert K. Humphrey, Individually and as of the Estate of Blanche Meyer Humphrey v. The C. G. Jung Educational Center of HoustonFifth Circuit· 1980-08-21· cited 13×
- Slaughter v. Mallet Land & Cattle Co.Fifth Circuit· 1905-10-02· cited 8×
- Wiggins v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1947-05-16· cited 6×
- Witherspoon v. OlcottFifth Circuit· 1902-12-16
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Whitehead v. FoleyTexas Supreme Court· 1866-10-15· cited 37×
- Gullett v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court· 1881-02-04· cited 35×
- Leland v. WilkinsonSupreme Court· 1836-02-17· cited 22×
- Todd v. Fisher & MillerTexas Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 20×
- Wright v. DailyTexas Supreme Court· 1863-07-01· cited 19×
- Glasscock v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court· 1861-07-01· cited 17×
- Johnson v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 10×
- Galan v. Town of GoliadTexas Supreme Court· 1870-07-01· cited 9×
- Saunders v. BrockTexas Supreme Court· 1867-10-15· cited 7×
Other cases named League v. Rogan
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.