Leach v. Kersey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the stalking “statute is analyzed with guidance from the statute governing injunctions against repeat violence, section 784.046”
• holding that because petitioner failed to demonstrate that she suffered substantial emotional distress through competent, substantial evidence, the trial court erred in granting the injunction against stalking
• holding that because petitioner failed to demonstrate that she suffered substantial emotional distress after her lover’s wife contacted her through social media and the telephone, the trial court erred in granting the injunction against stalking
• holding that because petitioner failed to demonstrate that she suffered substantial emotional distress after her lover's wife contacted her through social media and the telephone, the trial court erred in granting the injunction against stalking
• reversing stalking injunction in part because petitioner’s testimony failed to demonstrate that she suffered substantial emotional distress
• reversing injunction and holding Leach's several messages to Kersey by phone, through friends, and on social media, after she learned of an eighteen-month affair between Kersey and Leach's husband, could not be found to serve \ 'no legitimate purpose' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).