Skip to main content
· 6/3/2002

Leab v. S & H MINING CO.

Citations

  • 76 S.W.3d 344
  • 2002 Tenn. LEXIS 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[W]e must avoid constructions which would render portions of the statute meaningless or superfluous.\
  • “[W]e must avoid constructions which would render portions of the statute meaningless or superfluous.”
  • “[W]e must avoid constructions which would render portions of the statute meaningless or superfluous.”
  • “[W]e must avoid constructions which would render portions of the statute meaningless or superfluous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Drowota, Anderson, Holder, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.