Lea v. State
Citations
- 64 Miss. 278
Syllabus
<p>1. Perjury. Indictment for. Materiality of false oath. How averred.</p> <p>It is sufficient in an indictment for perjury to charge generally that the matter sworn to in the false oath was material to the issue or point of inquiry upon which it was taken, without showing particularly how it was material.</p> <p>2. Same. Corroborative evidence. Instruction. Case in judgment.</p> <p>L. was indicted for falsely swearing that he had not unlawfully sold liquors to C., Gr., B., etc. The court instructed the jury trying his case that separate unlawful sales which different witnesses testified had been made by L. at different times might be treated as corroborative evidence of each other. Held, that this was error. Any one sale must be proven by two witnessesj or one witness and corroborating circumstances, and proof of one sale is no t corroborative evidence of another.</p>
Judges: Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smallwood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-07-03· cited 13×
- Nash v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1962-12-10· cited 7×
- State v. SilverbergMississippi Supreme Court· 1901-03-15· cited 6×
- People v. RosenburgNew York County Courts· 1952-07-03· cited 4×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 1999-09-07
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.