Skip to main content
· 2/27/2009

LE v. Joslin

Citations

  • 202 P.3d 677
  • 41 Kan. App. 2d 280
  • 2009 Kan. App. LEXIS 90

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Here, even if the unique circumstances doctrine is still viable, no equitable exceptions justify its application.”
  • \[A]ctual knowledge of the pendency of an action is not a substitute for service.\
  • actual knowledge of the pendency of an action is not a substitute for service; otherwise, it would be meaningless for a party to ever assert insufficiency of service of process as a defense
  • actual knowledge of the pendency of an action is not a substitute for service; otherwise, it would be meaningless for a party to ever assert insufficiency of service of process as a defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Green, Marquardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.