· 2/27/2009
LE v. Joslin
Citations
- 202 P.3d 677
- 41 Kan. App. 2d 280
- 2009 Kan. App. LEXIS 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Here, even if the unique circumstances doctrine is still viable, no equitable exceptions justify its application.”
- \[A]ctual knowledge of the pendency of an action is not a substitute for service.\
- actual knowledge of the pendency of an action is not a substitute for service; otherwise, it would be meaningless for a party to ever assert insufficiency of service of process as a defense
- actual knowledge of the pendency of an action is not a substitute for service; otherwise, it would be meaningless for a party to ever assert insufficiency of service of process as a defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Green, Marquardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.