Le Page v. New Orleans Gas Light & Banking Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Hendricks is “qualified to talk about damages typically suffered by victims of credit reporting inaccuracies”
• finding Mr. Hendricks to be an expert qualified to discuss the type of reasonable procedures a credit furnisher should implement to assure maximum possible accuracy when reporting credit history
• “Unless evidence is clearly inadmissible on all potential grounds, evidentiary rulings should be deferred until trial so that questions of foundation, relevancy, and potential prejudice may be resolved in proper context.” (cleaned up)
• finding Hendricks’ methods sufficiently reliable
• finding Hendricks’ methods sufficiently reliable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).