Le Blanc v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding error was harmless where considered as a whole the jury could not have been misled by the instructions so that the verdict left \no room for doubt or speculation\
• holding error was harmless where considered as a whole the jury could not have been misled by the instructions so that the verdict left “no room for doubt or speculation”
• holding error was harmless where considered as a whole the jury could not have been misled by the instructions so that the verdict left “no room for doubt or speculation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).