Skip to main content
· 8/29/2000

LDM, Inc. v. PRINCETON REG. HEALTH COMM.

Citations

  • 764 A.2d 507
  • 336 N.J. Super. 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the New Jersey legislature had preempted the field of smoking regulation by enacting a clear, comprehensive regulatory scheme, thereby barring regulation by local ordinances in Princeton
  • interpreting similar provision of New Jersey statute and holding that “[t]he authority of the municipality to restrict smoking in restaurants is limited to protecting life and property from fire”
  • local smoking ordinance preempted by state law that established pervasive, comprehensive, and exclusive scheme regulating “when, where, and under what circumstances smoking is allowed”
  • local smoking ordinance preempted by state law that established pervasive, comprehensive, and exclusive scheme regulating “when, where, and under what circumstances smoking is allowed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.