L.C.P. Chemicals v. Strickland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing superior court because it was not authorized to draw inferences different than those drawn byALJ/Board regarding claimant’s diligence in job search
• reversing superior court because it was not authorized to draw inferences different than those drawn by ALJ/Board regarding claimant’s diligence in job search
• superior court could not contravene ALJ’s finding that claimant failed to conduct a diligent search for work
• in the face of conflicting evidence, superior court was not authorized to draw inferences different than those drawn by the ALJ/Board as to the diligence of claimant’s job search
• “The Board is the sole judge of the evidence, of the credibility of the witnesses, and as to what evidence it will credit as the basis for an award.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).