Lazaro Larios v. Attorney General United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the cabin at issue is “used for ‘residential purposes’ anytime it is used as a place of abode, even if the persons occupying the cabin are residing there temporarily during a vacation”
• holding short-term vacation rentals are not barred by commercial-use prohibition in covenants
• rejecting inter- pretation of ‘‘residential purposes’’ that would mean that owner’s intermittent use of property as vacation home was in violation of restrictive covenant
• declining to affirm a judgment on a ground involving a disputed issue of fact “not raised or resolved in the trial court”
• property is used for ‘‘ ‘residential purposes’ anytime it is used as a place of abode’’
• “[Njeither [the] financial benefit nor the advertisement of the property or the remittance of a lodging tax transforms the nature of the use of the property from residential to commercial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).