Lazar v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]ithdrawal of [an] asylum application d[oes] not obviate the need for the IJ to determine whether his false application should be deemed frivolous.”
• “Lazar’s withdrawal of his asylum application did 15 not obviate the need for the IJ to determine whether his false 16 application should be deemed frivolous. . . . [T]he IJ’s 17 frivolousness finding was not mooted by the withdrawal of his 18 application.”
• “Lazar’s withdrawal of his asylum application did 14 not obviate the need for the IJ to determine whether his false 15 application should be deemed frivolous. . . . [T]he IJ’s 16 frivolousness finding was not mooted by the withdrawal of 17 [Lazar’s] application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).