Skip to main content
· 1/24/1983

Lazar v. Casale (In Re Casale)

Citations

  • 27 B.R. 69
  • 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court precludes fees and expenses for the bringing of a discharge complaint because, unlike Section 64(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, the Code requires prior court approval

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boris Radoyevich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.