LAYZER v. Leavitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The statutory language that 20 Congress used to define what is meant by ‘covered part D drug,’ along with the canons of statutory interpretation described above, make clear that the Act does not impose a [requirement that the drug be for a medically accepted indication].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).