Skip to main content
· 7/2/1996

Layton v. DEPT. OF HWY SAFETY & MOTOR VEH.

Citations

  • 676 So. 2d 1038
  • 1996 WL 362706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State has no common law or statutory duty to a licensed driver to “accurately maintain motor vehicle records”
  • finding that there is no common law or statutory duty to maintain accurate'records of 'compliance
  • finding that the state did not owe a duty to maintain accurate records and noting that no Florida case or statute had been cited which imposed such a duty
  • no common law or statutory duty to maintain accurate records of compliance with the laws regulating driving motor vehicles
  • “[T]he question of a duty of care is a question separate from the question of whether the governmental activity at issue is protected by operation of sovereign immunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Nortwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.