Layton v. Blue Giant Equipment Co. of Canada, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “identity of the manufacturer of the second lift-jack cannot be determined”
• granting summary judgment for defendants because plaintiff did not identify the manufacturer of the lift-jack that allegedly injured her
• declining to apply alternative liability theory, in part because it was not apparent that plaintiff could not identify the manufacturer through the exercise of reasonable diligence
• declining to apply alternative liability theory, in part because it was not apparent that plaintiff could not identify the manufacturer through the exercise of reasonable diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).