Skip to main content
· 12/28/1990

Layton City v. Peronek

Citations

  • 803 P.2d 1294
  • 151 Utah Adv. Rep. 23
  • 1990 Utah App. LEXIS 195
  • 1990 WL 217671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jail incident report noting inmate’s consumption of alcohol was not prepared in the regular course of business but rather was an “investigatory report intended for prosecutorial purposes”
  • holding that jail incident report noting inmate's consumption of alcohol was not prepared in the regular course of business but rather was an \investigatory report intended for prosecutorial purposes\
  • extending Bertul to an incident report introduced at a probation revocation hearing where the district court applied the Utah Rules of Evidence
  • finding a jail incident report inadmissible because it “was made with the intent to submit it to the court for ‘prosecution’ of a probation violation”
  • finding a jail incident report inadmissible because it \was made with the intent to submit it to the court for 'prosecution' of a probation violation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenwood, Jackson, Orme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.