Laytham v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that evidence of outcomes in “ ‘comparable’ court cases” would not assist the jury in determining what a reasonable judge should have decided
• explaining that evidence of outcomes in \'comparable' court cases\ would not assist the jury in determining what a reasonable judge should have decided
• finding that it was for the jury to \apply the law to the facts\ to determine \what a reasonable judge would have decided\ with respect to the confirmation of a bankruptcy reorganization plan
• cautioning against the use of putatively “comparable” cases as evidence in malpractice cases
• reversal of an evidentiary ruling is not warranted unless the complaining party was prejudiced by that ruling
• reversal of an evidentiary ruling is not warranted unless the 4 complaining party was prejudiced by that ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).