Skip to main content
· 11/19/1992

Layne v. Newberg

Citations

  • 841 S.W.2d 181
  • 1992 Ky. LEXIS 176
  • 1992 WL 336878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • particular construction of statute rejected because it “flies in the face of the stated purpose of the [Workers’ Compensation] Act”
  • particular construction of statute rejected because it “flies in the face of the stated purpose of the [Workers’ Compensation] Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens, Lambert, Leibson, Reynolds, Spain, Wintersheimer, Combs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.