Laymon v. T. D. Williamson, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a limited private right of action should the Secretary of the Occupational “arbitrarily or capriciously fail[ ] to seek” an injunction to remedy workplace hazards requiring immediate attention
• “In general, OSHA, rather than private litigants, is responsible for assuring workplace safety. In furtherance of that objective, the OSH Act funnels safety grievances through OSHA’s administrative processes.”
• “In general, OSHA, rather than private litigants, is responsible for assuring workplace safety. In furtherance of that objective, the OSH Act funnels safety grievances through OSHA's administrative processes.”
• “In general, OSHA, rather than private litigants, is responsible for assuring workplace safety. In furtherance of that objective, the OSH Act funnels safety grievances through OSHA’s administrative processes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).