Layman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[u]nder the plain language of OCGA § 17-8-3 . . . the State does not need the defendant’s consent to obtain an order of nolle prosequi before the case has been submitted to a jury”
• finding that there had been 7 The Supreme Court of Georgia, however, has already addressed and decided a similar argument adversely to Blanton in Layman v. State, 280 Ga. 794 (631 SE2d 107) (2006
• finding that there had been no allegations of abusive conduct or harassment by the State and that the dispute over the indictment at issue on appeal instead stemmed from the defendant’s claim that the State had failed to sufficiently specify the date on which the alleged crime occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Layman v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-06-30· cited 43×
• Sanders v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-06-12· cited 32×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-06-27· cited 20×
• Blanton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-12· cited 18×
• Shane v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-26· cited 4×
• Aa-Professional Bail Bonding v. Deal
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-07-08· cited 3×
• Funk v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-05-10· cited 2×
• Robert David Jordan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-04-22
• James Edward Shane v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-26
• Adam Funk v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-05-10
• Dwight T. Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-06-27
• Dean Blanton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-12

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lejeune
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-02-10· cited 54×
• State v. Layman
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-05-23· cited 42×