Skip to main content
· 6/30/1997

Laycock v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 682 N.E.2d 382
  • 289 Ill. App. 3d 264
  • 224 Ill. Dec. 821
  • 1997 Ill. App. LEXIS 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because plaintiffs do not assert how they were prejudiced *** plaintiffs fail to establish a necessary element of estoppel.”
  • where language of insurance policy is clear and unambiguous, it must be given its plain and ordinary meaning
  • “Because plaintiffs do not assert how they were prejudiced *** plaintiffs fail to establish a necessary element of estoppel.”
  • “[P]rejudice cannot be presumed from the mere allegation that plaintiffs were lulled into a false sense of security without allegations or evidence of a resulting loss or action to their detriment.”
  • “[P]rejudice cannot be presumed from the mere allegation that plaintiffs were lulled into a false sense of security without allegations or evidence of a resulting loss or action to their detriment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inglis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.