· 12/16/1986
Laya v. Erin Homes, Inc.
Citations
- 352 S.E.2d 93
- 177 W. Va. 343
- 1986 W. Va. LEXIS 572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that corporations are presumed to be separate entities and that the “corporate entity may be disregarded” only “[u]nder exceptional circumstances”
- listing nineteen circumstances that permit a finding of personal liability, including the formation and use of the corporation to assume the existing liabilities of another entity
- listing nineteen circumstances that permit a finding of personal liability, including the formation and use of the corporation to assume the existing liabilities of another entity
- listing other factors for Court to consider in piercing the veil analysis
- using the following two-prong test to determine whether to pierce a corporate veil in a breach of contract case: (1) unity of interest and ownership such that separate personalities no longer exist; and (2) equitable considerations if acts are ascribed to corporation alone
- “This limited liability is one of the legitimate advantages of doing business in the corporate form.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McHUGH
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.