Skip to main content
· 12/16/1986

Laya v. Erin Homes, Inc.

Citations

  • 352 S.E.2d 93
  • 177 W. Va. 343
  • 1986 W. Va. LEXIS 572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that corporations are presumed to be separate entities and that the “corporate entity may be disregarded” only “[u]nder exceptional circumstances”
  • listing nineteen circumstances that permit a finding of personal liability, including the formation and use of the corporation to assume the existing liabilities of another entity
  • listing nineteen circumstances that permit a finding of personal liability, including the formation and use of the corporation to assume the existing liabilities of another entity
  • listing other factors for Court to consider in piercing the veil analysis
  • using the following two-prong test to determine whether to pierce a corporate veil in a breach of contract case: (1) unity of interest and ownership such that separate personalities no longer exist; and (2) equitable considerations if acts are ascribed to corporation alone
  • “This limited liability is one of the legitimate advantages of doing business in the corporate form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McHUGH

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.