· 1/29/2010
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Chittum
Citations
- 689 S.E.2d 811
- 225 W. Va. 83
- 2010 W. Va. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failing to properly maintain and administer a separate client trust account and commingling personal money with client funds violated Rule 1.15(a) and (d) even when no client funds were misappropriated
- reprimanding attorney even though “there was no actual injury to any client . . . with regard to Mr. Chittum’s commingled funds and failure to maintain a proper IOLTA account.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.