Skip to main content
· 4/5/2018

Lawton Blalock v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an economic benefit is a constructive dividend when the corporation provides it to a shareholder “with no expectation of reimbursement”
  • “The crucial test of the existence of a constructive dividend is whether ‘the distribution was primarily for the benefit of the shareholder.’”
  • “The crucial test of the existence of a constructive dividend is whether ‘the distribution was primarily for the benefit of the shareholder.’”
  • “A taxpayer who is a shareholder has been held to have received a constructive dividend when he receives an economic benefit through a diversion of corporate earnings and profits”
  • “Where a corporation confers an economic benefit on a shareholder without the expectation of repayment, that benefit becomes a constructive dividend, taxable to the shareholder, even though neither the corporation nor the shareholder intended a dividend.”
  • “Where a corporation confers an economic benefit on a shareholder without the expectation of repayment, that benefit becomes a constructive dividend, taxable to the shareholder, even though neither the corporation nor the shareholder intended a dividend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.