Lawson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying exception after the appellant completed parole because “of the importance of the issue of fines, costs and restitution and that of the imposition of backtime” (cleaned up)
• no remand necessary where recom-mitment within presumptive range of remaining technical parole violations, even though one violation held unsupported by the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).