Lawson v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the modification of the claimant’s burden of “substantial factor” to “prevailing factor” to qualify as a compensable injury under the worker’s compensation law was substantive, and therefore, could not be applied retrospectively
• finding the modification of the claimant’s burden of “substantial factor” to “prevailing factor” to qualify as a compensable injury under the worker’s compensation law was substantive, and therefore, could not be applied retrospectively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).