Lawson v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that I.Q. of 71 was not within range of § 12.05(C)
• refusing to take into consideration a measurement error of 5 points
• “A decision holding that illiterate individuals could not perform Level 1 jobs . . . is illogical and would directly contradict the Social Security regulations.”
• “A decision holding that illiterate individuals could not perform Level 1 jobs . . . is illogical and would directly contradict the Social Security regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).