Lawrentz v. Lawrentz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an indictment involving multiple defendants may remain sealed, even if one or more defendants’ whereabouts are known, as long as the decision is “based on the legitimate prose-cutorial needs of the Government to capture those properly indicted from criminal activity”
• defendant did not show memory loss occurred during the specific sixteen months indictment was under seal
• prejudice due to memory loss is \more difficult to establish *** than the prejudice resulting from the more usual grounds such as the death or disappearance of a witness or the loss of physical evidence\
• prejudice due to memory loss is “more difficult to establish *** than the prejudice resulting from the more usual grounds such as the death or disappearance of a witness or the loss of physical evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).