Lawrence Wilson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parole officers “lack the seizure power contemplated by” the proviso because they can only seize contraband in plain view with parolees’ consent
• “Because the power to seize evidence depends on the consent of the person from whom the evidence is to be taken, however, parole officers lack the seizure power contemplated by section 2680(h), and thus cannot be considered law enforcement personnel.”
• federal parole officers not subject to proviso

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).