Skip to main content
· 7/1/1865

Lawrence v. Rokes

Citations

  • 53 Me. 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that section 152.201(a) provides the “exclusive jurisdictional basis” for a Texas court to exercise jurisdiction over a child custody determination
  • noting that New Mexico court had not declined jurisdiction under either section 152.207 or 152.208 but solely because Texas had decided to exercise jurisdiction, a reason the supreme court held the UCCJEA does not allow
  • explaining Texas court should not have assumed jurisdiction when New Mexico court had not yet declined jurisdiction under UCCJEA
  • “But one state may have jurisdiction over custody even if the divorce is decided by another state’s court.”
  • “The separation[-]of[-]powers doctrine prohibits one branch of government from exercising a power belonging inherently to another.”
  • “But one state may have jurisdiction over custody even if the divorce is decided by another state’s court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Danforth, Kent, Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.