· 7/1/1865
Lawrence v. Rokes
Citations
- 53 Me. 110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that section 152.201(a) provides the “exclusive jurisdictional basis” for a Texas court to exercise jurisdiction over a child custody determination
- noting that New Mexico court had not declined jurisdiction under either section 152.207 or 152.208 but solely because Texas had decided to exercise jurisdiction, a reason the supreme court held the UCCJEA does not allow
- explaining Texas court should not have assumed jurisdiction when New Mexico court had not yet declined jurisdiction under UCCJEA
- “But one state may have jurisdiction over custody even if the divorce is decided by another state’s court.”
- “The separation[-]of[-]powers doctrine prohibits one branch of government from exercising a power belonging inherently to another.”
- “But one state may have jurisdiction over custody even if the divorce is decided by another state’s court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Danforth, Kent, Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.