Lawrence v. Mississippi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Mills announced a new rule of constitutional law that nevertheless may not be applied retroactively
• holding that Mills announced a new rule of constitutional law that nevertheless may not be applied retroactively
• concluding that a rule was new where, in the case announcing the rule, four Justices dissented, expressing the view that the Court’s outcome was not controlled by precedent
• concluding that a rule was new where, in the case announcing the rule, four Justices dissented, expressing the view that the Court's outcome was not controlled by precedent
• holding that the rule announced in Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367, 108 S. Ct. 1860 (1988), doesn’t apply retroactively on collateral review
• holding that the rule announced in Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367, 108 S.Ct. 1860, 100 L.Ed.2d 384 (1988), doesn’t apply retroactively on collateral review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).