Skip to main content
· 9/4/2003

Lawrence v. McCarthy

Citations

  • 344 F.3d 467
  • 2003 WL 22026353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in the context of jurisdictional arguments similar to those presented in the present case, that “[ajbstention is particularly appropriate ... because an individual’s status is a question of fact which the military courts are more intimately familiar with than the civil courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Jones, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.