District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/11/1980
Lawrence v. Lawrence
Citations
- 384 So. 2d 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The purpose of an award of attorney's fees is to insure that both parties will reasonably have the same ability to secure competent legal counsel.\
- “We find that the trial court’s order was not sufficiently explicit and precise with reference to the time for payment of arrearages to support a conclusion that appellant willfully or wantonly violated that order.”
- “One may not be held in contempt of court for violation of an order or a provision of a judgment which is not clear and definite so as to make the party aware of its command and direction.”
- “One may not be held in contempt of court for violation of an order or a provision of a judgment which is not clear and definite so as to make the party aware of its command and direction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hersey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blaydes v. BlaydesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-06-29· cited 36×
- Keitel v. KeitelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-02· cited 32×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-18· cited 14×
- Ross Dress for Less Virginia, Inc. v. CastroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-05· cited 13×
- Carnival Corp. v. BeverlyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-16· cited 12×
- American Pioneer Cas. Ins. Co. v. HenrionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-04-20· cited 9×
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-09· cited 9×
- Merrill Lynch Trust Co. v. Alzheimer's Lifeliners Ass'n, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-27· cited 9×
- Menke v. WendellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-11-06· cited 9×
- Hunnefeld v. FutchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-07· cited 8×
- Marcus v. MarcusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-18· cited 8×
- Cooley v. MoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-16· cited 7×
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-13· cited 7×
- CHAD GODWIN v. STEPHANIE GODWIN n/k/a STEPHANIE ANN FESTADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-15· cited 6×
- Creel v. CreelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-11· cited 5×
- Miranda v. MirandaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-08· cited 5×
- Rudolph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-13· cited 4×
- Cancino v. CancinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-13· cited 4×
- Power Line Components v. Mil-SpecDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-12· cited 3×
- Escribano v. CovielloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-10· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cummings v. CummingsSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-03-31· cited 83×
- Kranis v. KranisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-05-20· cited 30×
- Hettinger v. McMahonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-06-03· cited 14×
- Scattergood v. ScattergoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-10-25· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.