Michigan Court of Appeals· 3/18/1986
Lawrence v. Lawrence
Citations
- 388 N.W.2d 291
- 150 Mich. App. 29
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding “interest dating from the due date until the date of satisfaction,” where the husband’s payments were “overdue”
- award of prejudgment interest in divorce proceedings within discretion of trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gribbs, Burns, Warshawsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thomas v. ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-03-20· cited 13×
- Ashbrenner v. AshbrennerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-11-18· cited 12×
- Dasher v. DasherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-02· cited 11×
- Olson v. OlsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-14· cited 10×
- Reigle v. ReigleMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-05-20· cited 9×
- Walworth v. WimmerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-07-07· cited 8×
- Krisfalusi v. KrisfalusiMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-07-17· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Saber v. SaberMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-10-07· cited 17×
- Youmans v. YoumansMichigan Court of Appeals· 1981-07-31· cited 6×
- Farley v. FischerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-09-18· cited 5×
- Landy v. LandyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-01-17· cited 4×
- McClure v. McClureMichigan Court of Appeals· 1977-05-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.