Skip to main content
· 9/15/2010

Lawrence v. City of St. Paul

Citations

  • 740 F. Supp. 2d 1026
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96762
  • 2010 WL 3724380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering plaintiffs criminal complaint, state-court judge’s finding of probable cause, transcript of the plaintiff's plea hearing, judgment, and register of actions in plaintiff's criminal case in the motion to dismiss
  • holding Heck is not jurisdictional
  • “A private party does not conspire with government actors for purposes of § 1983 merely by invoking an exercise of the state official’s authority.”
  • “When a victim of a crime reports that crime to a police officer, she is exercising her First Amendment right to petition the government for the redress of grievances.”
  • “When a victim of a crime reports that crime to a police officer, she is exercising her First Amendment right to petition the government for the redress of grievances.”
  • “even if police defendants knowingly inserted false information in their reports, [plaintiff] was not deprived of a constitutional protected interest because of that false information, and thus she was not deprived of substantive due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patrick J. Schiltz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.