Skip to main content
· 5/27/1987

Lawrence v. Chicago Title Insurance

Citations

  • 192 Cal. App. 3d 70
  • 237 Cal. Rptr. 264
  • 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding typical title insurance policy is not abstract of title and does not guarantee title is as set forth therein. Rather, title insurance policy only indemnifies insured for any losses resulting from cloud on insured's title as contained in policy provisions
  • holding typical title insurance policy is not abstract of title and does not guarantee title is as set forth therein. Rather, title insurance policy only indemnifies insured for any losses resulting from cloud on insured’s title as contained in policy provisions
  • where insures had not seen or relied upon preliminary title report prior to making loan, reliance required for negligence claim was absent
  • title insurance is in the nature of a warranty
  • title insurance is in the nature of a warranty
  • “title insurance is in the nature of a warranty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.