Lawrence v. AQUARIUS SALES & SERVICE, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the JCC erred in making a finding on PIR because Claimant’s PIR was not at issue
• modifying order by striking JCC’s findings on issue not pled below, and affirming as modified
• modifying order by striking JCC’s errant findings, and affirming as modified
• modifying JCC’s order in part, and affirming as modified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).