Seventh Circuit· 12/2/2004
Lawrence Stepney v. Naperville School District 203
Citations
- 392 F.3d 236
- 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 357
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24827
- 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,959
- 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1473
- 2004 WL 2749862
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that alleged discriminatory acts that do not fall within 300-day window for bringing an EEOC charge are time-barred
- explaining that the ADA has the same exhaustion requirements as Title VII
- rejecting appellant’s argument that he did not have sufficient information to file an EEOC charge when the alleged violation occurred
- affirming summary judgment despite allegations that discriminatory actions were a “continuing violation”
- “Because the ADA’s enforcement provision expressly incorporates § 2000e-5 of Title VII, claims for discrimination under the ADA also must be filed within 300 days.”
- an EEOC charge must be filed within 300 days after the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Manion, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCTenth Circuit· 2006-08-08· cited 348×
- Tobin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceFirst Circuit· 2009-01-23· cited 185×
- Bernstein v. BankertSeventh Circuit· 2012-12-19· cited 161×
- Bahri Begolli v. Home Depot, U.S.A.Seventh Circuit· 2012-11-29· cited 57×
- Lewis v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2008-06-04· cited 29×
- Moore-Fotso v. Board of EducationN.D. Illinois· 2016-09-29· cited 29×
- Graham v. United Parcel ServiceN.D. Illinois· 2007-10-01· cited 15×
- Norman Bernstein v. Patricia BankerSeventh Circuit· 2012-12-19· cited 14×
- Porter v. New Age Services Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2012-02-07· cited 14×
- Gul-E-Rana Mirza v. the Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2009-05-06· cited 11×
- Malcolm Cobb, Jr. v. Aramark Correctional ServicesSeventh Circuit· 2019-08-29· cited 7×
- Duignan v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2017-04-06· cited 4×
- Herr v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2006-08-23· cited 3×
- DeLon v. Eli Lilly & Co.S.D. Indiana· 2013-12-31· cited 3×
- Easton v. COLLEGE OF LAKE COUNTYN.D. Illinois· 2008-07-10· cited 1×
- Williams v. Milwaukee Health Services Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2014-04-18· cited 1×
- Fortune v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-03
- Norman Bernstein v. Patricia BankertSeventh Circuit· 2013-07-31
- Arthur Lewis, Jr. v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2008-06-04
- Gamas v. Anheuser-BuschD. New Hampshire· 2005-02-23
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court· 1980-12-15· cited 2,132×
- Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 677×
- Brenda Dandy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2004-10-29· cited 209×
- Faye Haugerud v. Amery School DistrictSeventh Circuit· 2001-08-02· cited 135×
- John A. Thelen v. Marc's Big Boy Corp., Marcus Corp., and Stephen H. MarcusSeventh Circuit· 1995-08-21· cited 114×
- Janet Lever v. Northwestern UniversitySeventh Circuit· 1992-11-09· cited 108×
- Sandra M. Speer v. Rand McNally & Company, a Delaware CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1997-08-27· cited 108×
- Dasgupta v. University of Wisconsin Board of RegentsSeventh Circuit· 1997-09-03· cited 101×
- Bettina S. Sharp v. United Airlines, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 2001-01-02· cited 57×
- Caroline Williamson v. Indiana UniversitySeventh Circuit· 2003-09-23· cited 53×
- Charlie Reese, Jr. v. Ice Cream Specialties, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2003-10-30· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.