Lawrence Lucas v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court acted within its discretion when it gave the jury further instruction on the law because both parties had presented arguments on the theory
• upholding defendant's stalking conviction based on stalking by third party at defendant's direction
• stalking and harassment statutes broad enough to encompass act of directing third parties to harass the victim
• analyzing supplemental instruction given in response to jury question to determine whether it accurately reflected the law and sufficiently apprized the jury on that law
• upholding defendant’s stalking conviction based on stalking by third party at defendant’s direction
• \Whether to give further instructions in response to a request from a deliberating jury is within the discretion of the trial court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).